Search:

Ace's Blog
Rantings and Ravings from a retired old fart

A blog about Arts & Entertainment.
About ACEYOU


Real Name:
ACE YOU
Gender:
male
Member Since:
January 22, 2008
Last Signed In:
December 15, 2008
Profile Views:
263
Blog Views:
1234
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Bakersfield Jazz Workshop - Kama Ruby & Ezekiel Victor - 12/16/08
Talking Head TV Shows, or, I Need to Get a Life
XM / Sirius Merger - Programming Disaster
MASTERS OF MALFUNKTION FEATURING KAMA RUBY
John McCain Knows What's Best for Women...The John McCain Women's Clinic
Psssst - They're Almost Here....
Bakersfield Jazz Workshop - LaWanda Smith, Jazz Vocalist
THE POLITICS OF HATE
Vote for Ace in 2008!!! He's No Worse than Anyone Else!!!!
Want a hothead to have his finger on the button when that 3 AM phone call comes in?
Archives
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL
ACEYOU - > Ace's Blog -> Bakersfield Californian - Home Grown Ripoff?
Bakersfield Californian - Home Grown Ripoff?

OK - geez, I hate to always seem like I'm complaining,

but,

I subscribe to both The L.A. Times and The Bakersfield Californian.

The last several months, more and more of the articles in The Californian are articles I've already read in The L.A. Times! And many others are from other newspapers.

What's up with that? And some of them (including one in Thursday's paper) I read in the Times several months ago!!!

So, it's bad enough that the "News" the Californian is printing is something someone else published, but, it isn't even "News" anymore!!!

To the editors of The Californian - I'm already paying the L.A. times for the articles that you are printing after the fact. Why should I continue to subscribe to your rag?

And peeps wonder why the print newspaper business is losing to the net...

 

Posted in these Groups:
Topics: newspapers, Californian, Los Angeles Times
posted by ACEYOU on Thursday, January 31, 2008 at 11:57 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 36 times
6 comments from 4 users

1

posted by Chase on Feb 1, 2008 at 10:59 AM

Don't a lot of newspapers work that way?  With many local writers covering their stories and then others from a press-pool so to speak (AP writers).  That was my understanding at least. Imagine having to cover that amount of news through local resources.  The same works with television news programs.  There are numbers of pre-filed reports that are used to fill time or when the story is out of local ability to properly document.  If anyone knows anything beyond that, let me know, this is all my best guess on the matter.

posted by an1ok1joe on Feb 1, 2008 at 01:00 PM

Haha yes Chase you are right not only are there "packages" that come to TV stations from out of town or major markets. The local anchors or report then lays down their OWN voice track and tries to make the story localized. Packages general come in split track., nat sound (or natural sounds and reporter track), The local station pulls the reporter track and often times  is lazy and repeats what the reporter has said via hmmm AP news service  text that goes along with the package. And now you know, the rest of the story, I'm an_ok_joe, Good Day!

posted by AnnieLWhite on Feb 1, 2008 at 01:04 PM

bakersfield liberal crappiforian is what it is.

posted by deusexmachina on Feb 1, 2008 at 01:11 PM

The Bakersfield Californian is not meant to be our source for Nationwide or Worldwide news.  I believe, and someone correct me if I'm wrong, that the main purpose of our local newspaper is to report local news that we wouldn't get elsewhere.  If you want to up to the second, minute, or day news, then CNN.com is your bet....if you want updated daily, USA Today is the best rag around.  If you want local news with interjected  cute stories about puppies being saved from housefires, then The Bakersfield Californian is it. (or if you are morbid like me, you like to read the Obits everyday)  I think they should charge less and I would feel better about it.  It's also good for wrapping your drinking glasses during a house move.

posted by AnnieLWhite on Feb 2, 2008 at 01:27 PM

DEUX, I COULDNT AGREE MORE.

posted by an1ok1joe on Feb 3, 2008 at 01:23 AM

Well now days Newspapers and TV think we need a little ET or Access Hollywood with our news. Back in the day news was only 15 minutes long on TV. The local news paper was smaller in fact when I was a kid locally there was a smaller paper called "The Bakersfield News Bulletin" It was  small paper when just the facts and obits.

The Californian is not going to go back to the old days. In fact they want a lot of advertisers. They know goofy people will buy the paper for 2 bucks a pop a day if they make it thick enough full of mind less junk. I say you want entertainment? Watch  those shows on TV or buy the weekly periodicals. Don't like the news shows? Don't watch um. I DVR the first 20 minutes and scan through it. All the rest of it is a second prouducer with his new diatribe of crap just changed around a little.

Oh and hey Ms. White? Did the California not print your  lost dog add er something? I bet you'd read it if the former actor turned presidential candiate drop out bought it huh?  To you everthing is about conservative Republican politics huh? Ok ok I'll let you get back to goosestepping to the Grand Old Party's theme.

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)