|
Vous ne parlez pas pour moi! If you missed it! Have a Gay ole time - Prop. 8 & The TFP I was walking past a black guy... Rumour Has It Hello! Over the grapevine and down the 405 I've been whitewashed. I wrote this late a few nights back. Hello there. August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
I wrote this late a few nights back.
This is my philosophy on politics: it is not who is more right, but who grabs the most attractive position first, regardless of it's grounding in good evidence. I've been thinking lately about the nature of power and the power of argumentation over rationale. Because unfortunately fallacy can be a powerful persuader of the common man. Why is it that a black person can say "Nigger" and a white person can't? Reverse racism, that's why! How come gays can say "Fag" but it's homophobic when a straight person says it? Because we are trying to protect the gays right to speech but smother dissention to that lifestyle! But really - why? Simple, because the terms have been laced with connotations that reach down much further than it being "simply a word." So we try to stop ourselves there. We try to prevent ourselves from stepping on the toes of the historically oppressed and we try to present ourselves as 'enlightened' and 'progressive', because the term 'Conservative' has become an insult in the minds of many. So then we continue moving in our shroud of 'progressive' tendencies and develop a smug sense of self-satisfaction that keeps us warm at night in our blogosphere/don't have to really do much but 'imagine a world' to be considered forward-thinking... o-dome. I'm tired of forward thinking. I want forward doing. And not only that, I want forward-doing that doesn't run the risk of becoming so 'enlightened' that it loses all grounding in reality simply because the premises of what has been makes you feel better than facing what exists now. And furthermore, I want to meet the forward-thinker who denounces bigotry and actually means it. The one who calls for questioning authority and truly means just that. Because questioning authority isn't merely some concept that means listening to your music really loud and disrespecting "The Man!" It is a calculated and self-reflective tool that relies not only on your ability to disagree with those in power, but also to agree with those in power if they are in the right by means of discriminating between sound and unsound arguments. But we are all about fashion today. Fashion sets off a visceral comfort that makes it so much easier to play make-believe than to actually make reality. I want to meet the person who wants to combat poverty, but not be ignorant to the fact that it isn't just the system that keeps people down, but sometimes the people themselves. I want to meet the person who realizes that welfare checks aren't going to set people up to live a life of luxury and that maybe circumstances just force that position in some. I want to meet the person who can acknowledge that feeding a family of 6 is not an easy thing to do, and that help should be implimented, but also that personal choice dicates where some of these people go and trying to address that isn't going to dis-enlighten you or make you an evil Republican. So where are these people? It's late, I'm going to sleep. I know there isn't enough written here to truly get at what I mean, maybe I'll elaborate when I have time and you feel like reading 500 pages of self-inflated bullsh*t. Ta. 3 comments from 3 users
1
posted by
japo
on Jul 21, 2008 at 08:51 PM
I am not sure where you are headed with this complaint. Are you saying that you secretly want to call blacks "Niggers" but are afraid to be labeled a racist? Do you want to call gays "Fags" but feel homosexuals have monopolized the word and in turn hindered your freedom to address them as such? I honestly do not understand. Perhaps you can dumb it down a bit and switch some of the $50 words with some nickel and dime ones so I can understand it better. It really sounds like a well thought topic and maybe its just me. posted by
an1ok1joe
on Jul 21, 2008 at 10:36 PM
posted by
Chase
on Jul 28, 2008 at 12:26 PM
What I am saying (and again, keep in mind I wrote it late, hah), is that when we start to try and change things for the better, we begin to leave our reason at the starting line. Many people are all for free speech until free speech disagrees with them. I don't think those words should be used to attack a person. I was also trying to point out the reasons that certain people are not 'allowed' to say those words. You have the dissenting opinion that it is because of ideas like 'reverse racism' but fail to see the connection to history that has charged those words with such negative connotations that they have special significance in our society. I don't know if I ever posted the other part to what I wrote though. But I probably will post it later, it clarifies a lot.
1
|